|
|
Falling
into the banal rather than arguing a controversial matter.
|
|
Making
a black and white distinction between fact and opinion, rather than
making an assertion with evidence.
|
|
|
|
Building
to thesis at the end, but not revising the introduction. |
|
Straying from the thesis.
Failing
to understand that writing is always discovery and that the thesis
should be tentative and revised later.
|

|
|
|
Paragraph
unity, with in-depth issue coverage. |
|
Overdependence
on sources.
|
|
|

|
Summation
of sources rather than synthesis.
Listing what
each critic said separately. Improperly integrating sources without "marking," or proper documentation.
|
|
Awkward syntax
Students
need to read aloud.
|

|
|

|
Not managing
the flow of information in a sentence
Students bury
the main point in a clause, just as they bury original ideas in
paragraph fluff.
|
|
Pacing
Students
leave no time to revise or use interlibrary loans.
|

|
|
|
Believing revision is changing a word here and there, adding a
comma etc. |
|
Misconceiving audience for assignment.
|
|
|
|
Failing
to see where and how to use evidence.
Students use secondary evidence as "proof," rather than responding to it. |